Peer Review Process

Review Process:
All manuscripts will be subject to a well-established, fair, unbiased review and referring procedure, and are considered on the basis of their significance, novelty, and usefulness to the Journals readership. Before assigning to reviewers, the manuscripts are checked by
iThenticate for detection of plagiarism. The reviewing structure will always ensure the anonymity of the referees. The review output will be one of the following decisions:

1) Accept
2) Minor revisions
3) Major revisions
4) Reject

Authors will receive comments provided by the reviewers for their articles. In case of minor revisions, they will be asked to make modifications based on the provided comments which again will be sent for the next phase of review.
Editorial Board Meeting: The Editor-in-Chief calls an editorial board meeting twice a year. The provided reviews are discussed during the meeting.

Notification of results: The editor-in-chief sends the author(s) an acceptance letter when the article is finalized and approved by the Editorial Board members.

Average review time: 4 months